How I was murdered in my own home and lived to pay for it.

Quacks Admit Defeat Don Duck Suits.

This is of interest:


(NaturalNews) Many vaguely understand that the American Psychiatric Association (APA) keeps making up diseases as they continue developing new issues of their DSM or Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.

Recently, a founding father of ADHD (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder), announced a few months before his death that ... "ADHD is a prime example of a fictitious disease."

After turning 87 years old, American psychiatrist Dr. Leon Eisenberg made this statement to the German weekly Der Spiegel on 2 February 2012. Seven months later, he died. Apparently, he had decided to come clean and confess before moving to the beyond.

Dr. Eisenberg was among the committee of psychiatrists who put together the DMS II in 1968. He had initially coined the term "hyperkinetic reaction of childhood," which was described and agreed upon by the committee and confirmed by a small percentage of APA members as a mental disorder. Later, the term was altered to the current ADHD.

Yet, there is no biological proof or test to determine exactly what chemicals are "out of balance" in the brain for ADHD or any other disorder. Most psychiatric drugs are unnecessary at least. And they have often caused suicide and homicide.


Mental health slurs and quackery are the first line of defense and offense for those who want to mislead and take advantage of others.

Don't worry, they will invent others they can use to replace this fraud. Try out "Useless Arm Syndrome" or "Mystery Cutlery Disorder" to name 2 more.

Others who have experience with use of medicines and covert harms to harm everyday, average Jane and Joe, citizens:

Mental health agendas in the USA are compelled via threats of violence, and starvation, homelessness, and continued familial abuse along with overt and covert acts of violence, thefts and financial harms and frauds, and acts of drugging and intentional poisonings.

There are many reasons this would be done, in my case it was leading to an effort at extra judicial euthanasia via murder/suicide and was being done to protect the state, my parents, and the police who conspired in violent hate crimes against me and the use of my sister and I in efforts to produce child pornography with my parents and their friends in the law.

“Virtually anyone at any given time can meet the criteria for bipolar disorder or ADHD. Anyone. And the problem is everyone diagnosed with even one of these ‘illnesses’ triggers the pill dispenser.” — Dr. Stefan Kruszewski, Psychiatrist

Problem being again when the State uses this to obstruct justice and to perform character assassination, witness suppression, and extra judicial euthanasia.

They'd be better off fixing these problems properly.

Memorial for Thomas Stephen Szasz
Born in Budapest, Hungary on Apr. 15, 1920

Departed on Sep. 8, 2012 and resided in Manlius, NY.

Thomas Stephen Szasz, M.D., 92, died at his home in Manlius, N.Y. on September 8, 2012. He was born in Budapest, Hungary in 1920, and emigrated to the United States in 1938. He graduated the University of Cincinnati with an undergraduate degree in physics in 1941, and as valedictorian of the medical school in 1944. After medical internship at Boston City Hospital and psychiatry residency at the University of Chicago, he pursued psychoanalytic training.

Following military service at the United States Naval Medical Center in Bethesda, M.D., he began a distinguished career in 1956, as Professor of Psychiatry at Upstate Medical Center where he retired in 1990, but continued publishing until his death. He argued that what are called mental illnesses are often better described as "problems in living," and he opposed involuntary psychiatric interventions. His reputation in defense of these principles was launched in 1961 with The Myth of Mental Illness. He published 35 books, translated into numerous languages, and hundreds of articles in the subsequent 50 years. Recognized worldwide as one of the most important critics of psychiatric coercion and a defender of individual responsibility and freedom, Dr. Szasz was the recipient of several honorary degrees and many awards, including the Humanist of the Year, Jefferson Award from the American Institute of Public Service, Mencken Award from the Free Press Association, establishment of "The Thomas S. Szasz Award for Outstanding Contributions to the Cause of Civil Liberties" by the Center for Independent Thought, and the George Washington Award from the American Hungarian Foundation.

He is survived by his daughters, Margot Szasz Peters, M.D. (Steve Peters, M.D.), and Suzy Szasz Palmer, M.L.S., (Larry Palmer, LL.B.), a grandson Andrew Thomas Peters, and his brother George Szasz, Ph.D. Arrangements will be private. Contributions may be made in his name to the E. S. Bird Library at Syracuse University. 222 Waverly Avenue Syracuse, N.Y. 13224-5040

"His reputation in defense of these principles was launched in 1961 with The Myth of Mental Illness. "

For those of you who had any doubt about the validity of the Psychiatric industry as a whole, you'd need to understand those who invented the "science".

Watching this movie would help you understand how and why people like me would tell you to accept the fact this is a fraud to harm you. A medical provider named Raghu confided in me this is all about money for him, he does not care about me either way one bit, and they really don't know how any of this medicine works.

The obvious lies and violence, done OUTSIDE a hospital setting, make my case plain. Along with the other behaviors done to harm me with collusion and cooperation from my pedophile parents who worked to punish and blame the victim in an effort to dispose of me in total.

Mental health agendas were used in an effort to protect abusive parents who cooperated with the medical fraudsters who made this mess along with the violent felons and others who drugged me covertly and did other violent atrocities to me with the hope to use mental health harms to erase my witness and person.

While my experience alone won't necessarily discredit the whole discipline as a fraud, likely the fact nothing has been done to stand against this, meaning credible medical care in the wake of it, my experience likely supports any notion that these people are visiting death and murder and torture upon people with this medical hoax. I have been denied real medical care likely to retaliate, to obstruct, and to hope to reinstall a mental health solution which of course I told them is not possible. You can't cure a broken limb or knife wound with a pill. Certainly if you lie about it, call it something else, or refuse to see it as it is. And then compel me to remain in the care of those doing it and breaking the law.

Problem for them is going to be these approaches were ongoing throughout my life and comments from dentists (Such as Castle and Ritzenthaler of Lockport NY) who drilled most of my teeth for profit that said I had too many teeth in my head (Recall Benjamin Rush who claimed patients had too much blood in their heads) seem to indicate they had this solution in mind all along.

And the cure rate over 100's of years is 0%.

Psychiatry: An Industry of Death

You can not be cured of something that does not exist or that is being caused by the person looking to cure you.

Problem in this comment:

"Psychiatry: An Industry of Death is a controversial documentary on the horrors of psychiatry, of punishing and persecuting of the innocent and promoting Fascism, racism and atheism."

The church uses this set of frauds also to cause harm, to eradicate their victims and to install Jesus in the lives of those it has harmed.

Another tool to compel.

Raghu asked if I wanted to attend his Church (The Chapel in Amherst NY) since he knew the others had harmed me. What flavor of Jesus today? Tomorrow?

Why ask now since I had just survived a murder attempt by the woman who drugged me to install this fraud to begin with?

Know that Church elders, mostly women, were angry and upset in 2003 that I had learned the truth about the knife wounds.

They wanted to keep me from knowing that.

This all matters.

This would be a criminal conspiracy. Without paranoid defenses to claim otherwise.

Transparent and lame. But damaging all the same.

The end problem for it all is those doing this are ok with too much.

They'd need to get upset about something.


You support criminality and sociopathic behaviors and the want to turn your victims into animals like you.

In effect.

"Religion is true to the common people, false for the wise, and useful to the powerful." The Roman Senator, Seneca

This can also be useful to unseat the corrupt who are empowered (responsible).

Religion is part of this fraud as are sophistry based belief systems and occult.

For you, I've studied Psychology in college and saw it as a fraud early on.

Interesting point.... the female professor was KEENLY aware of the fact I made that determination based on the logical fallacies that founded the faith (quackery) in the classroom at SUNY Buffalo's Amherst Campus.

She noticed it and made a note of it.


Which I find creepy based on what I now know to be true, I was not being educated, my witness was being influenced and suppressed. She was looking for a response and studied me specifically over others in the class.

This is hugely important since SUNY Buffalo conspired in this hate crime and the child harms and atrocities against me with their friends in the law and my pedophile parents.

When It Comes To Depression, Serotonin Isn't The Whole Story -

Chemical imbalance myth takes a big public fall (no, antidepressants do NOT correct an imbalance of serotonin, nor do other psychiatric drugs correct anything at all)

Psychiatry’s Grand Confession

Several months ago Ronald Pies published an interesting article in Psychiatric Times entitled, “Psychiatry’s New Brain-Mind and the Legend of the Chemical Imbalance.” Pies, just like the experts on NPR, acknowledges that the Chemical Imbalance theory is not true. However, according to Pies, it was the pharmaceutical companies who espoused the theory, and not well-informed, practicing clinicians, because the psychiatry community has known all along that the theory is not true.

But if the Psychiatry Community knew all along that the theory was not true, then why did they not clarify this issue for the general public? Shouldn’t they have pointed out to the general public and patients that what the pharmaceutical companies were saying about psychological stress was not true? Why did the professional societies not publicly set the record straight?

There are many angry comments on the NPR website. These comments are interesting, because apparently many patients who were told that depression is caused by a chemical imbalance never understood that were hearing a metaphor and not science. Since the chemical imbalance theory is often presented as a rationale for taking SSRIs, such patients now understandably feel lied to by their clinicians.

Powerful Psychiatrists Push False Theory on Unknowing Souls

It is widely believed that National Public Radio has a liberal bias. Let us then consider the following: Yesterday on “Morning Edition,”(1) several psychiatrists acknowledged there is not a shred of evidence that low serotonin level causes depression, revolutionary talk in light of the rampant bias in the mental health system – accepted unquestioningly by far too many laypeople – that troubling emotions come from well-established chemical imbalances and thus can be cured with drugs that affect those chemicals.

Consider this quotation from the NPR story: “Chemical imbalance is sort of last-century thinking. It’s much more complicated than that,” says Dr. Joseph Coyle, a professor of neuroscience at Harvard Medical School. “It’s really an outmoded way of thinking.” Pretty clear message from Coyle, who edits the Archives of General Psychiatry.

Here is the bizarre and deeply disturbing part of the NPR story: Alan Frazer, who chairs the pharmacology department at the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio and researcher of the drugs that are marketed under the label (and promise) “antidepressants,” announces that it is fine for patients to believe in this unproven theory. Why? It enables them to “come out of the closet” about being depressed. Did Frazer not think how stunningly unethical and probably illegal it is to tell, or allow patients to believe, something that has never been proven? And did the NPR interviewer fail to challenge this practice, or did an editor higher up the chain cut the question (if it was asked) and answer?

As in we are going to need you to cooperate with us and take these pills or we are going to have to call the Police. To which I say right, since I need to defer to the wisdom of pedophile parents who raped me violently as a child and defer to their witness and that of the Police who raped me as well and participated in a hate crime against me in 1981, I have to rely on their wisdom and character and their offers we are concerned for your health and safety.

I am not sure I need to explain this abortion of justice and medicine beyond that.

Mental health agendas were used to support felons who harmed me, discredit my witness, and to blame me for others harming me. None of which is possible.

This is FAR MORE than a mistake.

He (Daniel Carlat) express no ethical qualms, regrets, or remorse about pimping for pharmaceutical companies.

He regularly lies to patients.

Carlat’s words:

What we don’t know is we don’t know how the medications actually work in the brain. So whereas it’s not uncommon – and I still do this, actually, when patients ask me about these medications, I’ll often say something like, well, the way Zoloft works is it increases the levels of serotonin in your brain, in your synapses, the neurons, and presumably the reason you’re depressed or anxious is that you have some sort of a deficiency. And I say that not because I really believe it, because I know that the evidence isn’t really there for us to understand the mechanism. I think I say that because patients want to know something, and they want to know that we as physicians have some basic understanding of what we’re doing when we’re prescribing medications. And they certainly don’t want to hear that a psychiatrist essentially has no idea how these medications work

This is exactly what I was told by Dr. Bellamkonda Raghu at Brylin Hospitals Buffalo NY:

We don't know how this works....
I don't care about you, this is just about money for me.
I can dispense medicine or poison.

"The great question that has never been answered, and which I have not yet been able to answer, despite my thirty years of research into the feminine soul, is 'What does a woman want?'" -- Sigmund Freud.

Seems naive to me in total.

The fact mental hygiene laws and treatment are allowed to go as far as they do for the reasons they go there is all you need to discredit that branch of "Medicine" in total.

The fact that these useless medications are forced upon victims of crime and atrocity even those with horrid brain and other CNS injury from poisoning events etc, says there is no truth or medical ethic or efficacy in this discipline.

Diagnostics and offers to treat have no basis in fact and treatments are sophistry and involve specious innuendo and other frauds and a large want to have the victim validate them for medical doctors doing this.

These treatments are useless since you are not treating the injury, you refuse to see it, most often you are causing new harms, and obscure current harms, and then you enable the victim into the same situations that made the problems to begin with.

Given the fact health providers would work with law enforcement (who in my case caused the child and other harm) who knew full and well that a person is a victim of horrid abuse, torture, murder, and mayhem as well as having them act with those doing the abuse and harm, especially abusive spouse and parents, says these people have no foundation in fact ever.

Given the fact such providers would deny actual or other treatment to intervene on such things as murder, attempted murder by poisoning etc and the fact this is allowed to go on for decades and to the point of the victim being dead more than once, says you will never get any help in this way and this medicine is murder in total and in fact.

No legal basis for it.

A crooked fool with a crooked smile.

The problem for Dr. Piwko and his associates is he acted to harm me, acted with prejudice protecting those like my father over me, as Piwko was also my father's medical care provider.

By that he partook in the murders and protected those who made the child harms including of course the sex and violence done to us as children.

You can not allow that.

And he and others are mandated reporters.

The other problem is the enabling of current harms.

The notion that these doctors were doing tests to determine efficacy of treatments, and the notion of them looking for indicators of disease or toxins says they did this to allow Heike and others to harm me to the point of death.

There is no truth in them or in their witness or diagnostics or medicine.

This is medical murder.

And for those people like these doctors and Police, those who never make mistakes and do that by refusing to correct or acknowledge them, they can't move forward in that mode since they later need to rely on murdering their mistakes lest they account for them to resolve them.

This is same trap and problem they enable with murdering pedophile parents et al who murder their victims in order to remain perfect.

And these doctors enable this problem as does the law with the want to say we are diagnosing this situation and are here to act to correct problems.

That never was forthcoming, the intervention that is, which says you are in harm's way. And it lead to more death, again. Which was medically documented in the past and they lied to me about it once more. You are done.

And for such people, they usually arrive at the last second when someone else decides to enforce the law so they can get on that train to seem right now. When in fact they should have acted decades ago.

The other problem is the tactic whereby these agents of state and medicine offered to use threat of violence to compel their medical and other frauds moving forward. Won't happen.

And for the law and medical doctors etc, you should have told me something instead of attempting to sell me on the opposite, that being this is my fault. It is not.